Rolando L. Olivia Rodriguez v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 2022
Docket01-20-00050-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Rolando L. Olivia Rodriguez v. the State of Texas (Rolando L. Olivia Rodriguez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rolando L. Olivia Rodriguez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF CONTINUING ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Rolando L. Olivia Rodriguez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-20-00050-CR

Trial court case number: 1562399

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

On September 17, 2020, this appeal was abated and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings regarding the trial court’s certification that this is a plea bargain case and appellant has no right to appeal. As discussed in our abatement order, our review suggests that the certification is defective and appellant has a right to appeal. Pursuant to our order, the trial court was directed to (1) hold a hearing within 30 days of the order and (2) cause a supplemental record to be filed with our Court within 30 days of the hearing. To date, however, a supplemental record has not been filed. Accordingly, we continue to abate the appeal. Unless the hearing has already been held pursuant to our abatement order, the trial court shall within 20 days of this order conduct a hearing at which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s counsel shall be present. Appellant shall also be present for the hearing in person or, if appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, appellant may participate in the hearing by closed- circuit video teleconferencing. The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing. We direct the trial court to: 1) Execute an amended certification of appellant’s right to appeal indicating whether or not appellant has the right to appeal; and

2) Make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems appropriate.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), (f), 34.5(a)(12), (c)(2), 37.1. The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification of appellant’s right to appeal and any other findings, recommendations, and orders of the trial court with this Court within 30 days of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(2). The court reporter is directed to file the reporter’s record of the hearing within 30 days of this order. The appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s record and the supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Sarah B. Landau________ Acting individually

Date: ___January 13, 2022_____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rolando L. Olivia Rodriguez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolando-l-olivia-rodriguez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.