Rolando Gonzales v. State
This text of Rolando Gonzales v. State (Rolando Gonzales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-421-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
ROLANDO GONZALES, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
_____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law
of Kleberg County, Texas.
___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, ROLANDO GONZALES, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order of the County Court at Law of Kleberg County, Texas, denying a motion to dismiss. Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not an appealable order. Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the same, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s notice, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice.
The Court, having considered the documents on file, this Court’s notice, and appellant’s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 7th day of October, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rolando Gonzales v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolando-gonzales-v-state-texapp-2004.