Rolando Flores v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 30, 2004
Docket07-04-00065-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Rolando Flores v. State (Rolando Flores v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rolando Flores v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

NO. 07-04-0065-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

APRIL 30, 2004

______________________________

ROLANDO G. FLORES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2003-402708; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Rolando Flores appeals a conviction for assault. We dismiss for want of

jurisdiction. BACKGROUND

On January 8, 2004, sentence was imposed on appellant in the 137th District Court

of Lubbock County (the trial court). He was convicted and sentenced for assault family

violence with one prior offense. The trial clerk prepared and has filed a clerk’s record. The

record reflects that on February 11, 2004, appellant filed a general notice of appeal

referencing his conviction for assault. The trial clerk filed a copy of the notice of appeal

with the record. On March 18, 2004, the appellate court clerk sent counsel a letter

requesting the parties to address the issue of jurisdiction. These responses were due no

later than April 16, 2004; counsel has not responded.

In a criminal case, appeal is perfected by timely filing a notice of appeal. TEX . R.

APP. P. 25.2(a). The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day sentence

is imposed or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order, unless a timely

motion for new trial is filed. TRAP 26.2(a). A motion for new trial may be filed by a criminal

defendant no later than 30 days after the date sentence is imposed in open court. TRAP

21.4(a). The time for filing a notice of appeal may be extended for 15 days under certain

circumstances. TRAP 26.3. If the time for filing a notice of appeal is to be extended, both

a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time which complies with TRAP 10.5(b)

must be filed within the 15 day period. TRAP 26.3; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523-

25 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).

An untimely-filed notice of appeal will not invoke the jurisdiction of the court of

appeals. See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). Thus, if an

-2- appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton v.

State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523-25.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. A motion to extend time to file the

notice of appeal was not filed. Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction over the

appeal. Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. TEX . R. APP. P. 39.8, 40.2, 43.2.

Phil Johnson Chief Justice

Do not publish.

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Smith v. Hartt & Cole
13 S.W.2d 408 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rolando Flores v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolando-flores-v-state-texapp-2004.