Rolando D. Becks v. the State of Texas
This text of Rolando D. Becks v. the State of Texas (Rolando D. Becks v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00340-CR
ROLANDO D. BECKS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 443rd District Court Ellis County, Texas1 Trial Court No. 46772CR, Honorable Cynthia Ermatinger, Presiding
May 20, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Rolando D. Becks, appeals his conviction for sexual assault2 and
sentence to twenty years of confinement. Appellant’s brief was originally due February
5, 2024, but we granted Appellant’s appointed counsel three extensions to file a brief due
to caseload. By letter of April 8, 2024, we admonished counsel that no further extensions
1 Originally appealed to the Tenth Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the
Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011(a)(1). would be granted and that failure to file a brief by May 6 would result in the appeal being
abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further
notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief or had any further communication
with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether Appellant is indigent;
(3) if appellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief;
(4) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on Appellant’s behalf;
(5) whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
(6) whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
(7) whether new counsel should be appointed;
(8) if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by June 20, 2024.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new
2 counsel; the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of
any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before June 3, 2024, she is directed
to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall
not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rolando D. Becks v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolando-d-becks-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.