Rolando Anaya and Margot Anaya, Individually and as Next Friend of Emily Nell Anaya, a Minor v. McAllen Hospitals, L.P.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 6, 2005
Docket13-05-00398-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rolando Anaya and Margot Anaya, Individually and as Next Friend of Emily Nell Anaya, a Minor v. McAllen Hospitals, L.P. (Rolando Anaya and Margot Anaya, Individually and as Next Friend of Emily Nell Anaya, a Minor v. McAllen Hospitals, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rolando Anaya and Margot Anaya, Individually and as Next Friend of Emily Nell Anaya, a Minor v. McAllen Hospitals, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-398-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

ROLANDO ANAYA, ET AL.,                                      Appellants,

                                           v.

McALLEN HOSPITALS, L.P.,                                       Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

                 On appeal from the 275th  District Court

                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

                    Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellants, ROLANDO ANAYA, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2093-03-E(1).  After the clerk=s record was filed and after the appeal was referred to mediation, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellants state that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences in this suit.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal and that costs of the appeal be taxed against appellants in accordance with the parties= agreement.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 6th day of October, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rolando Anaya and Margot Anaya, Individually and as Next Friend of Emily Nell Anaya, a Minor v. McAllen Hospitals, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolando-anaya-and-margot-anaya-individually-and-as-texapp-2005.