Roland v. Tedesco
426 So. 2d 175
Opinion
Crystal ROLAND
v.
Ignatius I. TEDESCO, III, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. The judgment dismissing plaintiff's suit is set aside, because of an abuse of discretion in denying a continuance. The suit is reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roland v. Tedesco, 426 So. 2d 175 (La. 1983).
426 So. 2d 175 (Roland v. Tedesco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Howard v. Lee
185 So. 3d 144 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
Anderson v. Cunningham
786 So. 2d 940 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
Gilbert v. Visone
743 So. 2d 909 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Walker v. Aulds
685 So. 2d 421 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Shields v. Crump
499 So. 2d 479 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Brown v. Louisiana State Medical Center
472 So. 2d 909 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)