Roland v. State
492 So. 2d 712, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8906
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 1986
DocketNo. BF-437
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 492 So. 2d 712 (Roland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roland v. State, 492 So. 2d 712, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8906 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
While we affirm the final judgment and sentence of the trial court, we cannot overlook the prosecutor’s improper comments during closing argument. We commend to the trial judge the use of swift and firm remedial action against counsel who engage in improper argument before a jury.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wells v. State
492 So. 2d 712 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
492 So. 2d 712, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.