Roland v. Sargent

5 F.3d 532, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30238, 1993 WL 349339
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 1993
Docket93-1573
StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.3d 532 (Roland v. Sargent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roland v. Sargent, 5 F.3d 532, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30238, 1993 WL 349339 (8th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

5 F.3d 532
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Dale Robert ROLAND, Appellant,
v.
W. H. SARGENT, Warden, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of
Correction; F. A. McHan, Major, Cummins Unit, Arkansas
Department of Correction; M. D. Biram, Hearing Officer,
Cummings Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction; Arkansas
Department of Correction; Betty Everett, originally sued as
Nurse Everett; PHP Healthcare Corp., Appellees.

No. 93-1573.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: August 26, 1993.
Filed: September 9, 1993.

Before McMILLIAN, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dale Robert Roland, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the magistrate judge's1 judgment in favor of defendants in this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. On appeal, Roland has neither provided nor requested a trial transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b). We are not convinced that Roland's arguments related to the factual findings are sufficiently meritorious to justify preparation of a transcript at government expense. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

Based upon the record before us, we find no error that would require reversal.

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

The Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 F.3d 532, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30238, 1993 WL 349339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-v-sargent-ca8-1993.