Roland v. Lomenzo
This text of 30 A.D.2d 712 (Roland v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs. There was no compliance with either subdivision 4 of section 137 of the Election Law or with article IX (§6, subd. [a]) of the Rules and Regulations of the Conservative Party of the State of New York. Special Term correctly found that “ there is no proof of any party rules providing for a Conservative Party committee for the 27th Congressional District and an examination of the Rules and Regulations of the Conservative Party of New York State, as filed with the Secretary of State, reveals no such provision”. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.2d 712, 290 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-v-lomenzo-nyappdiv-1968.