Roland v. Lancaster Co. N. Bank
19 A. 951, 135 Pa. 598, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1225
This text of 19 A. 951 (Roland v. Lancaster Co. N. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roland v. Lancaster Co. N. Bank, 19 A. 951, 135 Pa. 598, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1225 (Pa. 1890).
Opinion
This case does not require discussion. The plaintiff had a [601]*601full, adequate, and convenient remedy at law, and the court below committed no error in dismissing his bill for want of jurisdiction.
Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bishoff v. Valley Dairy Co.
153 A. 133 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Davis v. Republic Trust Co.
113 A. 689 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Smith v. Smith
38 Pa. Super. 251 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 A. 951, 135 Pa. 598, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-v-lancaster-co-n-bank-pa-1890.