Roland v. Grodson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Roland v. Grodson

182 Ill. App. 482, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 493

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 15, 1913

DocketGen. No. 17,861

StatusPublished

This text of 182 Ill. App. 482 (Roland v. Grodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roland v. Grodson, 182 Ill. App. 482, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 493 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Trial, § 31*—when cause is properly advanced. Held that the advancement for trial of a cause concerning an estate was proper where such estate would be damaged by the delay. 3. Executors and administrators, § 79*—when assets may he recovered. R. S. ch. 3, §§81, 82, J. & A. f ft 130, 131, as to the collection of assets by administrators, does not limit recovery only to “identical property,” and where a person charged with the duty of selling property and paying debts of a woman, only paid a portion of such debts, held that the administrator of such woman was entitled to recover the remainder of the proceeds arising from the sale of property. 4. Executors and administrators, § 226*—when claim need not he probated. In a proceeding by an administrator under R. S. ch. 3, §§ 81, 82, J. & A. flf 130, 131, to collect assets, where it appeared that an agent of the deceased was to be allowed a certain commission for selling property, it was not improper to allow the retention of such commission without forcing the agent to probate his claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Trial, § 31*—when cause is properly advanced. Held that the advancement for trial of a cause concerning an estate was proper where such estate would be damaged by the delay. 3. Executors and administrators, § 79*—when assets may he recovered. R. S. ch. 3, §§81, 82, J. & A. f ft 130, 131, as to the collection of assets by administrators, does not limit recovery only to “identical property,” and where a person charged with the duty of selling property and paying debts of a woman, only paid a portion of such debts, held that the administrator of such woman was entitled to recover the remainder of the proceeds arising from the sale of property. 4. Executors and administrators, § 226*—when claim need not he probated. In a proceeding by an administrator under R. S. ch. 3, §§ 81, 82, J. & A. flf 130, 131, to collect assets, where it appeared that an agent of the deceased was to be allowed a certain commission for selling property, it was not improper to allow the retention of such commission without forcing the agent to probate his claim.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 Ill. App. 482, 1913 Ill. App. LEXIS 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-v-grodson-illappct-1913.