Roland Ramos v. State
This text of Roland Ramos v. State (Roland Ramos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 11, 2020.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-20-00476-CR
ROLAND RAMOS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 98-CR-0766
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant attempts to appeal a February 7, 2020 order denying his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc, which sought to reform a judgment or judgments signed in 1999. The denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order. See Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet dism’d.); cf. Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (relief from denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc may be sought by filing application for writ of mandamus).
On July 8, 2020, this court notified all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless any party showed, within 21 days of the letter, that the court has jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). No response has been filed.
The appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roland Ramos v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-ramos-v-state-texapp-2020.