Roland June Lindsey v. United States

273 F.2d 77
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 1959
Docket14987_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 F.2d 77 (Roland June Lindsey v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roland June Lindsey v. United States, 273 F.2d 77 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant having filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 asking the District Court to vacate and set aside the sentences theretofore imposed upon him in Criminal Cases Nos. 68168 and 68169, and it not appearing that the files and records of the case conclusively show that appellant was entitled to no relief, and it appearing that some of the allegations of the motion if established might have entitled him to some relief, and the District Judge having denied the appellant’s motion after consideration thereof on the merits but without a hearing as required by Section 2255, and an appeal from such denial having come on for *78 consideration on the original record and having been fully heard, it is

Ordered by the court that the order of the District Court denying relief be and the same hereby is reversed and the case is remanded for a hearing and further proceeding under and in accordance with the requirements of said Section 2255. See Bailey v. United States, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 11, 246 F.2d 698; Bailey v. United States, 1959, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 370, 267 F.2d 647.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lindsey
178 F. Supp. 598 (District of Columbia, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 F.2d 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-june-lindsey-v-united-states-cadc-1959.