Roland Heath v. Walter Kautzky, Duane Woodard

941 F.2d 1213, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24160, 1991 WL 164274
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 1991
Docket91-1027
StatusPublished

This text of 941 F.2d 1213 (Roland Heath v. Walter Kautzky, Duane Woodard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roland Heath v. Walter Kautzky, Duane Woodard, 941 F.2d 1213, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24160, 1991 WL 164274 (10th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

941 F.2d 1213

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Roland HEATH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Walter KAUTZKY, Duane Woodard, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 91-1027.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 22, 1991.

Before STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, BRORBY and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner-appellant Roland Heath appeals a district court order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. In his petition, Heath attacks a prior Colorado conviction for which he claims he still is being held. After reviewing Heath's petition and the record, we AFFIRM the district court in all respects. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
941 F.2d 1213, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24160, 1991 WL 164274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-heath-v-walter-kautzky-duane-woodard-ca10-1991.