Roland Dorl v. The United States

923 F.2d 871
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 28, 1990·No. 90-5085·Unpublished

Opinion

923 F.2d 871

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Roland DORL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-5085.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 28, 1990.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 28, 1990.

Before PLAGER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the United States Claims Court, dismissing the appellant's complaint, is affirmed on the basis of the order of that court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roland Dorl v. The United States, 923 F.2d 871 (Fed. Cir. 1990).

923 F.2d 871 (Roland Dorl v. The United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Npc, Inc. v. Enviroengineering Products Co., Inc
923 F.2d 871 (Federal Circuit, 1990)