Roland Coit v. Jeff Trautvetter
This text of Roland Coit v. Jeff Trautvetter (Roland Coit v. Jeff Trautvetter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-14-00182-CV
ROLAND COIT APPELLANT
V.
JEFF TRAUTVETTER APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-002508-1
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On October 30, 2014, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed
as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless
appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within
ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: December 11, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roland Coit v. Jeff Trautvetter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-coit-v-jeff-trautvetter-texapp-2014.