Roland Buzenius v. National Labor Relations Board, United Paperworkers International Union United Paperworkers International Union, Local 1033, Intervenors

191 F.3d 641, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2555, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 25642
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 13, 1999
Docket96-5139
StatusPublished

This text of 191 F.3d 641 (Roland Buzenius v. National Labor Relations Board, United Paperworkers International Union United Paperworkers International Union, Local 1033, Intervenors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roland Buzenius v. National Labor Relations Board, United Paperworkers International Union United Paperworkers International Union, Local 1033, Intervenors, 191 F.3d 641, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2555, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 25642 (6th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

191 F.3d 641 (6th Cir. 1999)

Roland Buzenius, Petitioner,
v.
National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, United Paperworkers International Union; United Paperworkers International Union, Local 1033, Intervenors.

No. 96-5139

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Decided and Filed: October 13, 1999

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. Nos. 7-CB-9732(1); 7-CB-9732(2).

John C. Scully, NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION, Springfield, Virginia, for Petitioner.

Deborah E. Shrager, Margaret Ann Gaines, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLATE COURT BRANCH, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

James B. Coppess, AFL-CIO LEGAL DEPARTMENT, Washington, D.C., for Intervenors.

Before: SILER and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and HULL, District Judge.*

OPINION

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us again on remand from the Supreme Court, see United Paperworkers Int'l Union v. Buzenius, 142 L. Ed. 2d 397, 119 S.Ct. 442 (1998), for reconsideration in light of its decision in Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild, Inc., 525 U.S. 33, 142 L. Ed. 2d 242, 119 S.Ct. 292 (1998).

Respondent has moved for dismissal of the Petition for Review pursuant to Marquez. Petitioner Buzenius has not opposed this motion. Therefore, without expressing any opinion whatsoever on whether this case may be distinguishable from the Marquez decision, we DISMISS the Petition for Review.

Note:

*

The Honorable Thomas G. Hull, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild, Inc.
525 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Buzenius v. National Labor Relations Board
191 F.3d 641 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
United Paperworkers International Union v. Buzenius
525 U.S. 979 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 F.3d 641, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2555, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 25642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roland-buzenius-v-national-labor-relations-board-united-paperworkers-ca6-1999.