Rola Kolailat v. Lindsey McKennett

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided August 2, 2016·No. 153075·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

August 2, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

153075 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

ROLA KOLAILAT, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 153075 COA: 328333 Washtenaw CC: 15-000839-DC LINDSEY McKENNETT, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MCCORMACK, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from this Court’s order denying leave to appeal for the reasons identified in my dissenting statement in Mabry v Mabry, ___ Mich ___ (August 2, 2016) (Docket No. 153082).

BERNSTEIN, J., joins the statement of MCCORMACK, J.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 2, 2016

s0726

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rola Kolailat v. Lindsey McKennett, (Mich. 2016).

Rola Kolailat v. Lindsey McKennett (Rola Kolailat v. Lindsey McKennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.