Rokuson v. Beckinella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rokuson v. Beckinella

274 A.D. 804, 80 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3430

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 274 A.D. 804 (Rokuson v. Beckinella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rokuson v. Beckinella, 274 A.D. 804, 80 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. Order granting respondent’s application for an order directing the appellant to sign and issue a warrant for the eviction of a tenant of certain real property in the borough of Brooklyn, reversed on the law, without costs, and the petition dismissed, without costs. The appellant may not be required to sign and issue a warrant of eviction in summary proceedings, where the landlord has not complied with the requirements of Local Law No. 66 of 1947 of the City of New York, even though the nummary proceedings had reached the stage of the issuance of the warrant of eviction. The proceeding was still “ pending ” unless and until the warrant had been executed. (Whitmarsh v. Farnell, 273 App. Div. 584; Grattan v. Tierney Sons, Inc., 226 App. Div. 811; Matter of Tartaglia v. McLaughlin, 297 N. Y. 419.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. Order granting respondent’s application for an order directing the appellant to sign and issue a warrant for the eviction of a tenant of certain real property in the borough of Brooklyn, reversed on the law, without costs, and the petition dismissed, without costs. The appellant may not be required to sign and issue a warrant of eviction in summary proceedings, where the landlord has not complied with the requirements of Local Law No. 66 of 1947 of the City of New York, even though the nummary proceedings had reached the stage of the issuance of the warrant of eviction. The proceeding was still “ pending ” unless and until the warrant had been executed. (Whitmarsh v. Farnell, 273 App. Div. 584; Grattan v. Tierney Sons, Inc., 226 App. Div. 811; Matter of Tartaglia v. McLaughlin, 297 N. Y. 419.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 A.D. 804, 80 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rokuson-v-beckinella-nyappdiv-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack