Rokes v. Rokes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Rokes v. Rokes

285 S.E.2d 306, 55 N.C. App. 397, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2205

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 5, 1982

DocketNo. 8125DC356

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 S.E.2d 306 (Rokes v. Rokes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rokes v. Rokes, 285 S.E.2d 306, 55 N.C. App. 397, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2205 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant has no right of immediate appeal from the denial of his Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for permanent alimony. This is another attempt to appeal from a “Temporary Order.” Insofar as the record discloses, plaintiff’s claims for permanent alimony and counsel fees, and defendant’s claim for absolute divorce, are still pending in the district court. Thus, defendant’s appeal from the “Temporary Order” is subject to dismissal as being premature. See Stephenson v. Stephenson, 55 N.C. App. 250, 285 S.E. 2d 281 (1981).

We note defendant’s notice of appeal was not given within ten days of the entry of the order appealed from. Thus this Court has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. G.S. § 1-279.

The appeal is

Dismissed.

Chief Judge MORRIS and Judge MARTIN (Robert M.) concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant has no right of immediate appeal from the denial of his Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for permanent alimony. This is another attempt to appeal from a “Temporary Order.” Insofar as the record discloses, plaintiff’s claims for permanent alimony and counsel fees, and defendant’s claim for absolute divorce, are still pending in the district court. Thus, defendant’s appeal from the “Temporary Order” is subject to dismissal as being premature. See Stephenson v. Stephenson, 55 N.C. App. 250, 285 S.E. 2d 281 (1981).

We note defendant’s notice of appeal was not given within ten days of the entry of the order appealed from. Thus this Court has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. G.S. § 1-279.

The appeal is

Dismissed.

Chief Judge MORRIS and Judge MARTIN (Robert M.) concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 S.E.2d 306, 55 N.C. App. 397, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rokes-v-rokes-ncctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack