Rokenbaugh v. Wilshusen

City of New York Municipal Court

Rokenbaugh v. Wilshusen

20 Misc. 715, 45 N.Y.S. 1147

DecidedApril 15, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Misc. 715 (Rokenbaugh v. Wilshusen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rokenbaugh v. Wilshusen, 20 Misc. 715, 45 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, wherein judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for broker’s commission. The áetion was [716]*716fairly tried and impartially submitted and the law correctly presented to the jury.

The jury having passed on the disputed questions of fact and there being no errors, judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Yaw Wyck,'Oh. J., and Eitzsimows, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, wherein judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for broker’s commission. The áetion was [716]*716fairly tried and impartially submitted and the law correctly presented to the jury.

The jury having passed on the disputed questions of fact and there being no errors, judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Yaw Wyck,'Oh. J., and Eitzsimows, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Misc. 715, 45 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rokenbaugh-v-wilshusen-nynyccityct-1897.