Rojas v. State
This text of 148 So. 3d 818 (Rojas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Nestor Rojas, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus which alleged Tomoka Correctional Facility treated Appellant cruelly and inhumanly. Appellant argues the trial court erred by dismissing the petition as moot when Appellant was transferred to another correctional institution.
[819]*819Appellant was convicted of various sex offenses in Citrus County and was sentenced to sixty months incarceration. Appellant filled a habeas petition with the Florida Supreme Court, which referred the matter to the Volusia County Circuit Court. The Florida Department of Corrections responded by a motion to dismiss alleging Appellant’s petition was moot because Appellant had been transferred to Martin Correctional Institution.
The trial court properly dismissed the action because it was moot. See Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla.1992) (“A case is ‘moot’ when it presents no actual controversy or when the issues have ceased to exist.”); Martinez v. Singletary, 691 So.2d 587, 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (“Generally, an inmate’s grievance regarding the conditions of his confinement at a certain institution becomes moot upon his transfer to another facility.”).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 So. 3d 818, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15810, 2014 WL 5039669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rojas-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.