Rojas v. Selsky
This text of 55 A.D.3d 1189 (Rojas v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting lewd exposure. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the corroborating hearing testimony from the library clerk who authored it, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Taylor v Caldwell, 51 AD3d 1234, 1234 [2008]). Petitioner’s exculpatory statements created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Gawlik v Fischer, 50 AD3d 1282, 1283 [2008]). To the extent preserved, petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied the right to present witness testimony, have been considered and found to be unavailing.
Cardona, EJ., Peters, Rose, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 A.D.3d 1189, 865 N.Y.S.2d 584, 56 A.D.2d 911, 868 N.Y.S.2d 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rojas-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2008.