Rojas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-1220V Filed: June 24, 2016 UNPUBLISHED
**************************** BRANDY ROJAS, *
*
Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
v. * Influenza;
* Shoulder Injury (“SIRVA”);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
**************************** Samantha Travis, Bryan & Travis, PLLP, Kalispell, MT, for petitioner. Alexis Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On December 22, 2014, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving a trivalent influenza (“flu”) vaccination on October 29, 2013, petitioner suffered cause-in-fact injuries to her left shoulder including Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (“CRPS”) and Myofasical Pain Syndrome. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On March 10, 2015, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). On June 24, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”)
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
accompanied by Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Brandy Rojas. The Proffer indicates that petitioner should be awarded the following:
• $175,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering; and
• $1,511.34 for past unreimbursable medical expenses; and
• $10,696.65 to satisfy a lien for services rendered for her vaccine-related injury by Professional Therapy Associates/Kalispell Rehabilitation Associates, Inc., P.C. (“PTA/KRA”) from December 17, 2013 to April 21, 2014; and
• $14,358.00 for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment; and
• An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity as described in paragraph II(C) of the proffer that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan for the second year after judgment and all subsequent years.
Proffer at 2-3. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards the following:
• A lump sum payment of $190,869.34, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($14,358.00), pain and suffering ($175,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($1,511.34), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Brandy Rojas;
• A lump sum payment of $10,696.65, representing compensation for satisfaction of the outstanding PTA/KRA lien against petitioner, payable jointly to petitioner and PTA/KRA 1234 Whitefish Stage Road Kalispell, Montana 59901 ID# 9314 3;
• An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in the Proffer Section II.C. This amount represents all remaining elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under § 300aa-15(a).
.
3 Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to PTA/KRA.
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
BRANDY ROJAS, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
v. ) No. 14-1220V ) Chief Special Master Dorsey SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) ECF SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Items of Compensation
A. Life Care Items
Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CNLCP, and
petitioner engaged Liz Kattman, MS, to provide an estimation of Brandy Rojas’s future vaccine-
injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as described
in the respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report, filed March 6, 2015. All items of compensation identified
in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by the chart entitled
Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Brandy Rojas, attached hereto as Tab A. 1 Respondent
proffers that Brandy Rojas should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care
plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.
1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment.
B. Lost Earnings
The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Brandy Rojas has not suffered a
past loss of earnings and will not suffer a loss of earnings in the future. Therefore, respondent
proffers that Brandy Rojas should not be awarded lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine
Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
C. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that Brandy Rojas should be awarded $175,000.00 in actual and
projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and
suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
agrees.
D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable
expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,511.34. Petitioner agrees.
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents an outstanding lien claimed against her for
services rendered for her vaccine-related injury by Professional Therapy Associates/Kalispell
Rehabilitation Associates, Inc., P.C. (“PTA/KRA”) from December 17, 2013 to April 21, 2014.
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the
amount of $10,696.65 in order to satisfy the PTA/KRA lien, which amount shall be payable
jointly to petitioner and PTA/KRA. Petitioner agrees.
E. Medicaid Lien
Petitioner represents that there are no outstanding Medicaid liens against her.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below,
and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the
following: 2
A. A lump sum payment of $190,869.34, representing compensation for life care
expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($14,358.00), pain and
suffering ($175,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($1,511.34), in the form of a check
payable to petitioner, Brandy Rojas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rojas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Rojas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.