Rojas v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.

207 So. 3d 365, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18166
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 2016·No. Case No. 5D16-3051·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Aluia v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 205 So.3d 768, 2016 WL 3766717, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D1660 (Fla. 2d DCA July 15, 2016) (holding that debtor’s motion to dismiss was correctly denied because debt- or failed to plead and prove that creditor was “debt collector” as defined by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p).

ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rojas v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc., 207 So. 3d 365, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18166 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

207 So. 3d 365 (Rojas v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.
205 So. 3d 768 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)