Rojas v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.
207 So. 3d 365, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18166
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 9, 2016
DocketCase No. 5D16-3051
StatusPublished
This text of 207 So. 3d 365 (Rojas v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rojas v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc., 207 So. 3d 365, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18166 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Aluia v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 205 So.3d 768, 2016 WL 3766717, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D1660 (Fla. 2d DCA July 15, 2016) (holding that debtor’s motion to dismiss was correctly denied because debt- or failed to plead and prove that creditor was “debt collector” as defined by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.
205 So. 3d 768 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
207 So. 3d 365, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rojas-v-dyck-oneal-inc-fladistctapp-2016.