Rojas (Steven) Vs. State
This text of Rojas (Steven) Vs. State (Rojas (Steven) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
STEVEN ROJAS, No. 79887 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. NOV 2 5 2019 ELIZABETH A.. BROWI4 CLERK OF SOPREME COUR!'
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL EsY 5.`1 OEPtrry RK etEY
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for specific performance of guilty plea agreement. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for specific performance of guilty plea agreement in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
gt_tA J. Hardesty
, J. LIC:144it) , j. Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Steven Rojas Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
M-(-1 810g '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rojas (Steven) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rojas-steven-vs-state-nev-2019.