Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2025·No. 24-7536·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

FILED

NOV 10 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID SALVADOR-GOMEZ; DAVID ANGEL Agency Nos. SALVADOR-ROJAS; KORINA A246-606-483 SALVADOR-ROJAS, A246-606-482 A246-606-484

Petitioners, A246-606-485

v.

ORDER

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

BEFORE: S. R. THOMAS, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator A judge of this Court has sua sponte requested a vote on whether the Order issued by the three judge panel on October 24, 2025 and this case should be reheard en banc pursuant to General Order 5.4.c.3. To facilitate the en banc process, the three judge panel has consented to stay the Order issued on October 24, 2025. Therefore, the October 24, 2025 Order issued by the three judge panel is stayed pending the conclusion of en banc proceedings and further order of this Court.

The parties are permitted, but not required, to file simultaneous supplemental briefs addressing whether this case should be reheard en banc. The briefs shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order and shall not exceed 14,000 words.

At the direction of the panel, the pending motion to submit the case on the briefs is denied, but the oral argument scheduled for December 2, 2025 is vacated pending en banc proceedings and will be rescheduled by a subsequent order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi, (9th Cir. 2025).

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi (Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.