Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Rojac Company v. Trataros Construction, No. Cv94 0705175 (Oct. 13, 1994)

Rojac Company v. Trataros Construction, No. Cv94 0705175 (Oct. 13, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10376
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedOctober 13, 1994
DocketNos. CV94 0705175, CV94 0538347
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10376 (Rojac Company v. Trataros Construction, No. Cv94 0705175 (Oct. 13, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rojac Company v. Trataros Construction, No. Cv94 0705175 (Oct. 13, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10376 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE APPLICATIONS TO VACATE AND CONFIRMARBITRATION AWARD Plaintiff has failed to sustain its burden of proof that the "award was procured by undue means"; that the "award was procured through evident partiality on the part of the arbitrator" and that the "award was procured through complete disregard for the law by the arbitrator." As a result the application to vacate is denied.

Defendant has filed an application to confirm which must be granted if the award is not "vacated, modified or corrected as prescribed in sections 52-418 and 52-419." C.G.S. § 52-417.

Application to confirm is granted. CT Page 10377

N. O'Neill, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 52-417
Connecticut § 52-417

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rojac-company-v-trataros-construction-no-cv94-0705175-oct-13-1994-connsuperct-1994.