Roig v. Tim

103 Pa. 115, 1883 Pa. LEXIS 129
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 2, 1883
DocketNo. 206
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 103 Pa. 115 (Roig v. Tim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roig v. Tim, 103 Pa. 115, 1883 Pa. LEXIS 129 (Pa. 1883).

Opinion

The opinion of the court wras filed

Pek Curiam.

The service of an attachment execution has the effect of an equitable assignment of the thing attached. It puts the garnishee in the relation to the attaching creditor which he had sustained to his former creditor. He may make the same defense to the attachment by evidence of set-off or of other equities that he might have made if sued by his original creditor. If he has no defence against the latter,' he cannot set [118]*118up one against tlie attaching creditor. A valid set-off must be of a debt or demand due at the time of the commencement of the action in which it is interposed. If the claim is not then ripe for action it cannot be set off. All the rulings of the court below are as favorable as the plaintiff in error had a right to demand.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Royal Bank of Pennsylvania v. Selig
644 A.2d 741 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Integra Bank/Pittsburgh v. Petraglia (In Re Petraglia)
156 B.R. 474 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1993)
In Re Cabrillo
101 B.R. 443 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1989)
General Electric Credit Corp. v. Tarr
457 F. Supp. 935 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
Almi, Inc. v. Dick Corp.
375 A.2d 1343 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
In Re Boylan
65 F. Supp. 105 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1946)
Mills Automatic Merchandising Co. v. Brown
47 Pa. D. & C. 169 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Pennsylvania Co. v. Olson
36 Pa. D. & C. 221 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1939)
Citizens Trust Co. v. Trunk
30 Pa. D. & C. 511 (Clarion County Court of Common Pleas, 1937)
Duffy v. 58th & Chester Avenue Building & Loan Ass'n
325 Pa. 127 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Duffy v. B. L. Assn.
189 A. 307 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Commonwealth Trust Company of Pittsburgh's Appeal
188 A. 200 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Aarons v. Public Service Building & Loan Ass'n
318 Pa. 113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Pearlman v. Newburger
178 A. 402 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. Melnick
178 A. 144 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Aarons v. Pub. Ser. B. L. Assn.
178 A. 141 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Frazier v. Berg
159 A. 541 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Condran v. Kennedy
56 Pa. Super. 356 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Pocono Spring Water Ice Co. v. American Ice Co.
64 A. 398 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Russ v. Sadler
46 A. 903 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Pa. 115, 1883 Pa. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roig-v-tim-pa-1883.