Home/Washington Supreme Court/Rohsnagel v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Rohsnagel v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

124 P. 900, 69 Wash. 243, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 884
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1912
DocketNo. 10011
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 124 P. 900 (Rohsnagel v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rohsnagel v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 124 P. 900, 69 Wash. 243, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 884 (Wash. 1912).

Opinion

Crow, J.

Action by Philip Rohsnagel and Fredericka Rohsnagel, his wife, against Northern Pacific Railway Company, a corporation, to recover damages. A demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained, the action was dismissed, and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The only question is whether the second amended complaint, hereinafter called the complaint, states a cause of action. The following plat, marked Exhibit “A,” is attached to and made a part of the complaint:

[244]*244

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seal v. Naches-Selah Irrigation District
751 P.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1988)
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District
540 P.2d 1387 (Washington Supreme Court, 1975)
Tope v. King County
65 P.2d 1283 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. Royer
255 F. 881 (Ninth Circuit, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 P. 900, 69 Wash. 243, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohsnagel-v-northern-pacific-railway-co-wash-1912.