Home/Washington Supreme Court/Rohsnagel v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Rohsnagel v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

124 P. 900, 69 Wash. 243, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 884
Washington Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1912·No. No. 10011·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Crow, J.

Action by Philip Rohsnagel and Fredericka Rohsnagel, his wife, against Northern Pacific Railway Company, a corporation, to recover damages. A demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained, the action was dismissed, and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The only question is whether the second amended complaint, hereinafter called the complaint, states a cause of action. The following plat, marked Exhibit “A,” is attached to and made a part of the complaint:

[244]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rohsnagel v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 124 P. 900, 69 Wash. 243, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 884 (Wash. 1912).

124 P. 900 (Rohsnagel v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seal v. Naches-Selah Irrigation District
751 P.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1988)
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District
540 P.2d 1387 (Washington Supreme Court, 1975)
Tope v. King County
65 P.2d 1283 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. Royer
255 F. 881 (Ninth Circuit, 1919)