Rohrheimer v. Eagle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Rohrheimer v. Eagle

30 Ill. App. 498, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 325

DecidedJanuary 10, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Ill. App. 498 (Rohrheimer v. Eagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rohrheimer v. Eagle, 30 Ill. App. 498, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 325 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from Kankakee. Upon inspecting the record we find that there is no certificate of the judge to the bill of exceptions. In the absence of this certificate we can not inspect the evidence and we must presume the proceedings of the Circuit Court were in all respects regular, and the judgment was correct, the presumption of law being in favor of the regularity of the proceedings of all courts of general jurisdiction unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from Kankakee. Upon inspecting the record we find that there is no certificate of the judge to the bill of exceptions. In the absence of this certificate we can not inspect the evidence and we must presume the proceedings of the Circuit Court were in all respects regular, and the judgment was correct, the presumption of law being in favor of the regularity of the proceedings of all courts of general jurisdiction unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Ill. App. 498, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohrheimer-v-eagle-illappct-1889.