Rohr v. Crime Victim Compensation Commission
This text of Rohr v. Crime Victim Compensation Commission (Rohr v. Crime Victim Compensation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001109 05-APR-2016 07:54 AM
SCWC-12-0001109
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
CLAUDIA ROHR, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CRIME VICTIM COMPENSATION COMMISSION, of the State of Hawaii, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0001109; CIVIL NOS. 11-1-0299 and 11-1-300 (Consolidated))
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Claudia Rohr’s application for writ of certiorari filed on February 22, 2016, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 5, 2016.
Claudia Rohr /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Richard W. Stacey and Diane K. Taira /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rohr v. Crime Victim Compensation Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohr-v-crime-victim-compensation-commission-haw-2016.