Rohner Gehrig Company, Inc. v. Tri-State Motor Transit

931 F.2d 291, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7893, 1991 WL 65524
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rohner Gehrig Company, Inc. v. Tri-State Motor Transit. Read the opinion of the Court — 950 F.2d 1079
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 29, 1991·No. 89-6246·Published

Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc.

(Opinion February 15, 1991, 5 Cir., 1991, 923 F.2d 1118).

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rohner Gehrig Company, Inc. v. Tri-State Motor Transit, 931 F.2d 291, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7893, 1991 WL 65524 (5th Cir. 1991).

931 F.2d 291 (Rohner Gehrig Company, Inc. v. Tri-State Motor Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related