Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States

17 Cust. Ct. 319, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 884
United States Customs Court·Decided September 26, 1946·No. No. 6377; Entry No. 729890, etc.·Published

Opinion

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States, 17 Cust. Ct. 319, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 884 (cusc 1946).

17 Cust. Ct. 319 (Rohner Gehrig & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.