Rohn v. Rohn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Rohn v. Rohn

185 Ill. App. 595

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 31, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,336

StatusPublished

This text of 185 Ill. App. 595 (Rohn v. Rohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rohn v. Rohn, 185 Ill. App. 595 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Divorce, § 141*—when allowance of temporary alimony and solicitor’s fees pending appeal authorised. An order for five dollars a week temporary alimony and twenty-five dollars attorney’s fees pending an appeal from a previous order of the court, held authorized by the defendant’s answer upon which the order was based, it appearing therefrom that defendant had no one to support but himself and wife, that he had a lot worth two hundred dollars, and was receiving five hundred dollars a year for attending to his mother’s investments, and it not appearing that such duties took all his time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Divorce, § 141*—when allowance of temporary alimony and solicitor’s fees pending appeal authorised. An order for five dollars a week temporary alimony and twenty-five dollars attorney’s fees pending an appeal from a previous order of the court, held authorized by the defendant’s answer upon which the order was based, it appearing therefrom that defendant had no one to support but himself and wife, that he had a lot worth two hundred dollars, and was receiving five hundred dollars a year for attending to his mother’s investments, and it not appearing that such duties took all his time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 Ill. App. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohn-v-rohn-illappct-1914.