Rohn v. Dunbar

Ohio Supreme Court

Rohn v. Dunbar

13 Ohio St. 572, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 572

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Ohio St. 572 (Rohn v. Dunbar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rohn v. Dunbar, 13 Ohio St. 572, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 572 (Ohio 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court

A bill of review can not be filed in the district court to reverse an order dismissing an appeal for want of jurisdiction. The consent of parties could not give the district court jurisdiction to entertain such a bill of review. The case on the bill of review must be stricken from the docket of the district court, and the order reversing the order of dismissal, and reinstating for hearing the original case, must be set aside, and the case remanded to the district court, for proceedings under the last appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court

A bill of review can not be filed in the district court to reverse an order dismissing an appeal for want of jurisdiction. The consent of parties could not give the district court jurisdiction to entertain such a bill of review. The case on the bill of review must be stricken from the docket of the district court, and the order reversing the order of dismissal, and reinstating for hearing the original case, must be set aside, and the case remanded to the district court, for proceedings under the last appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ohio St. 572, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohn-v-dunbar-ohio-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack