Rohman v. Bunt

120 N.Y.S. 1143
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1910
StatusPublished

This text of 120 N.Y.S. 1143 (Rohman v. Bunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rohman v. Bunt, 120 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial justice dismissed the counterclaim herein upon the authority of Reiner v. Jones, 38 App. Div. 441, 56 N. Y. Supp. 423. In the case of Levy v. Roosevelt, 131 App. Div. 8, 115 N. Y. Supp. 475, it was held that a landlord was liable in an action for breach of contract for failure to repair a roof for damages suffered by a tenant of a portion of the premises by reason of injury to personal property left upon the premises under circumstances similar to those in the case under consideration. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide, the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reiner v. Jones
38 A.D. 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Levy v. Roosevelt
131 A.D. 8 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Reiner v. Jones
56 N.Y.S. 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 N.Y.S. 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohman-v-bunt-nyappterm-1910.