Rohm & Haas Company v. M/t Hada, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., and A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi

450 F.2d 338, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7090
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 1971
Docket71-2132
StatusPublished

This text of 450 F.2d 338 (Rohm & Haas Company v. M/t Hada, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., and A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rohm & Haas Company v. M/t Hada, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., and A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi, 450 F.2d 338, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7090 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

450 F.2d 338

ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
M/T HADA, her engines, tackle, apparel, etc., and A/S J.
Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 71-2132 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 16, 1971.

Frank Caton, Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellants; Baker & Botts, Houston, Tex., of counsel.

Robert C. Davee, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee; Eastham, Watson, Dale & Forney, Houston, Tex., of counsel.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG, and DYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 F.2d 338, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohm-haas-company-v-mt-hada-her-engines-tackle-apparel-etc-and-ca5-1971.