Rohm & Haas Company v. M/t Hada, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., and A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi
This text of 450 F.2d 338 (Rohm & Haas Company v. M/t Hada, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., and A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
450 F.2d 338
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
M/T HADA, her engines, tackle, apparel, etc., and A/S J.
Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 71-2132 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 16, 1971.
Frank Caton, Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellants; Baker & Botts, Houston, Tex., of counsel.
Robert C. Davee, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee; Eastham, Watson, Dale & Forney, Houston, Tex., of counsel.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG, and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 F.2d 338, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohm-haas-company-v-mt-hada-her-engines-tackle-apparel-etc-and-ca5-1971.