Rohm and Haas Company v. Brotech Corporation

Federal Circuit

Rohm and Haas Company v. Brotech Corporation

19 F.3d 41, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3102, 1994 WL 48546

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 18, 1994

Docket93-1303

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 F.3d 41 (Rohm and Haas Company v. Brotech Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rohm and Haas Company v. Brotech Corporation, 19 F.3d 41, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3102, 1994 WL 48546 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

19 F.3d 41

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellees,
v.
BROTECH CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-1303.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 18, 1994.

Before RICH, NEWMAN, and PLAGER, Circuit Judges:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI