Rohlfs v. Rohlfs
56 A.2d 886, 141 N.J. Eq. 269, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 616
This text of 56 A.2d 886 (Rohlfs v. Rohlfs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rohlfs v. Rohlfs, 56 A.2d 886, 141 N.J. Eq. 269, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 616 (N.J. 1948).
Opinion
We have examined the testimony and the briefs of counsel, and are of the opinion that.the proofs fully support the decree appealed from.
The decree is affirmed.
*270 For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Bueling, Wells, Dill, Feeund, McLean, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hehee, Schettino, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
56 A.2d 886, 141 N.J. Eq. 269, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohlfs-v-rohlfs-nj-1948.