Rohit Polavarapu v. State
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________
No. 07-19-00229-CR ________________________
ROHIT POLAVARAPU, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court Number Nine Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1573689; Honorable Brent A. Carr, Presiding
August 2, 2019
ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
Appellant Rohit Polavarapu appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated.1
The trial court sentenced Appellant to ninety days confinement in Tarrant County Jail;
however, it suspended the sentence in favor of community supervision for eighteen
months. Appellant gave timely notice of appeal. The appellate record is due September
1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.04 (West Supp. 2018). 4, 2019. Now pending before the court is the Motion to Withdraw as Attorney of Record
filed by Appellant’s retained counsel, Mr. Abe Factor. In the motion, counsel states that
there is a conflict of interest between Appellant and counsel. Pursuant to Rule of
Appellate Procedure 6.5, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and he is relieved as
Appellant’s attorney of record.
Because Appellant may be indigent and entitled to appointed counsel, we abate
the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(d)(1) (West Supp. 2018). Upon remand, the trial court shall
utilize whatever means it finds necessary to determine the following:
(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to the appointment of appellate counsel; and
(3) whether Appellant is entitled to have the clerk’s record and reporter’s record furnished without charge.
Should it be determined that Appellant wants to continue the appeal, is indigent,
and entitled to appointed counsel, the name, address, email address, telephone number,
and State Bar of Texas identification number of newly-appointed counsel shall be
provided to the clerk of this court. The trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions
of law, and any necessary orders addressing the foregoing subjects. The trial court shall
also cause to be developed (1) a clerk’s record containing the findings of fact, conclusions
of law, and any necessary orders and (2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence
and argument presented at any hearing held. The trial court shall cause the supplemental
record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before August 30, 2019.
2 It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rohit Polavarapu v. State (Rohit Polavarapu v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.