Rohde v. Duell
This text of 45 A.D.3d 1392 (Rohde v. Duell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered September 21, 2006. The order and judgment, insofar as appealed from, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the cross claims of defendants Chilson-Wilcox, Inc., Chilson-Wilcox Realty, LLC, Scott W. Chilson and Jay E. Wilcox against defendant William H. Duell, [1393]*1393doing business as Pennwood Construction, seeking common-law indemnification and/or contractual indemnification.
It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Lunn and Peradotto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.D.3d 1392, 845 N.Y.S.2d 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohde-v-duell-nyappdiv-2007.