Rogowski v. Brill

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rogowski v. Brill

132 N.Y.S. 1144

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 132 N.Y.S. 1144 (Rogowski v. Brill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogowski v. Brill, 132 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence adduced by the plaintiff is insufficient to overcome the objections sustained by this court in the case of Rogowski v. Brill, 131 N. Y. Supp. 589 (October Appellate Term, 1911). Upon a new trial, the parties may present the issue involved in a manner that will enable the court to determine the circumstances under which the notes were indorsed by the defendant. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The evidence adduced by the plaintiff is insufficient to overcome the objections sustained by this court in the case of Rogowski v. Brill, 131 N. Y. Supp. 589 (October Appellate Term, 1911). Upon a new trial, the parties may present the issue involved in a manner that will enable the court to determine the circumstances under which the notes were indorsed by the defendant. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogowski-v-brill-nyappterm-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack