Rogow v. Comerica Bank

737 N.W.2d 718
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 10, 2007
Docket133960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 737 N.W.2d 718 (Rogow v. Comerica Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogow v. Comerica Bank, 737 N.W.2d 718 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

737 N.W.2d 718 (2007)

Richard ROGOW and Ricki Rogow, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
COMERICA BANK, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Homecomings Financial Network, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, and
Rogo, Inc., d/b/a Big Daddy's Parthenon TTG, Inc., d/b/a Big Daddy's Parthenon TTGP, Inc., Big Daddy's Parthenon, Sailing Ship, Inc., Howard Babcock, Andrew C. Jacob, Linden Nelson, Anthanasios Peristeris, Robert S. Silverstein Trust, Robert S. Silverstein, and Jack B. Wolfe, Third-Party Defendants.

Docket No. 133960. COA No. 266430.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 10, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rollston
737 N.W.2d 718 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 N.W.2d 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogow-v-comerica-bank-mich-2007.