Rogow v. Comerica Bank
737 N.W.2d 718
Opinion
Richard ROGOW and Ricki Rogow, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
COMERICA BANK, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Homecomings Financial Network, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, and
Rogo, Inc., d/b/a Big Daddy's Parthenon TTG, Inc., d/b/a Big Daddy's Parthenon TTGP, Inc., Big Daddy's Parthenon, Sailing Ship, Inc., Howard Babcock, Andrew C. Jacob, Linden Nelson, Anthanasios Peristeris, Robert S. Silverstein Trust, Robert S. Silverstein, and Jack B. Wolfe, Third-Party Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogow v. Comerica Bank, 737 N.W.2d 718 (Mich. 2007).
737 N.W.2d 718 (Rogow v. Comerica Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Rollston
737 N.W.2d 718 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)