Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rogoff v. Two Grace Court Associates

Rogoff v. Two Grace Court Associates

201 A.D.2d 637, 609 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1477
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 22, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 637 (Rogoff v. Two Grace Court Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogoff v. Two Grace Court Associates, 201 A.D.2d 637, 609 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated July 16, 1991, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to restore the matter to the trial calendar, treating it as a motion to vacate the dismissal of the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff’s motion (see generally, Sheehan v Hollywood, 112 AD2d 211). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheehan v. Hollywood
112 A.D.2d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.2d 637, 609 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogoff-v-two-grace-court-associates-nyappdiv-1994.