Rogoff v. O'Rourke

New York Court of Appeals

Rogoff v. O'Rourke

274 N.E.2d 444, 29 N.Y.2d 664, 324 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1092

DecidedSeptember 8, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 274 N.E.2d 444 (Rogoff v. O'Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogoff v. O'Rourke, 274 N.E.2d 444, 29 N.Y.2d 664, 324 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1092 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the witnesses here involved were qualified to act as subscribing witnesses under subdivision 3 of section 135 of the Election Law, which does not require that such witnesses be enrolled voters in the county in which the petition is circulated.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Taking no part: Judge Bebgan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the witnesses here involved were qualified to act as subscribing witnesses under subdivision 3 of section 135 of the Election Law, which does not require that such witnesses be enrolled voters in the county in which the petition is circulated.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Taking no part: Judge Bebgan.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 N.E.2d 444, 29 N.Y.2d 664, 324 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogoff-v-orourke-ny-1971.