Rogisich v. Union Drydock Repair Co.
150 A. 670, 106 N.J.L. 591, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 249
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 596
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogisich v. Union Drydock Repair Co., 150 A. 670, 106 N.J.L. 591, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 249 (N.J. 1930).
150 A. 670 (Rogisich v. Union Drydock Repair Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shore Fishery, Inc. v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Commission
21 A.2d 634 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)