Roginsky (Roger) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 2019·No. 80045·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROGER ROGINSKY, A/K/A ROBERT No. 80045 ALAN ROGINSKY,

Appellant,

vs. Fq ED THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent. DEC 1 6 2019 ELIZAEE T.' A. 6ROM CLERK .71-; SU('REME COURT BY 71, ,

tE/

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a 'request for certificate of innocence." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev, 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

I , J.

Hardesty

, LIZ&E,)

Silver

, J.

cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge Roger Roginsky Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A .11160.

16i -507s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roginsky (Roger) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Roginsky (Roger) Vs. State (Roginsky (Roger) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)