Roginsky (Roger) Vs. State
This text of Roginsky (Roger) Vs. State (Roginsky (Roger) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ROGER ROGINSKY, A/K/A ROBERT No. 80045 ALAN ROGINSKY, Appellant, vs. Fq ED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. DEC 1 6 2019 ELIZAEE T.' A. 6ROM CLERK .71-; SU('REME COURT BY 71, , tE/ ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a 'request for certificate of innocence." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev, 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
I , J. Hardesty
, LIZ&E,) Silver , J.
cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge Roger Roginsky Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .11160. 16i -507s 11
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roginsky (Roger) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roginsky-roger-vs-state-nev-2019.