Roginski v. Rose
469 N.E.2d 527, 63 N.Y.2d 735, 480 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4591
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (97 AD2d 417).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roginski v. Rose, 469 N.E.2d 527, 63 N.Y.2d 735, 480 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4591 (N.Y. 1984).
469 N.E.2d 527 (Roginski v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Nathan v. Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead
125 A.D.3d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Franklin Square Donut System, LLC v. Wright
63 A.D.3d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Arata v. Peterson
254 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Frittita v. Pax
251 A.D.2d 1077 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Elwood Properties, Inc. v. Bohrer
216 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
L & M Realty v. Village of Millbrook Planning Board
207 A.D.2d 346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Wisoff v. Amelkin
123 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Buitenkant v. Robohm
122 A.D.2d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Knadle v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Huntington
121 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)