Roggio v. Hallmark Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roggio v. Hallmark Construction Corp.

64 A.D.2d 769, 407 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12615

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 20, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 769 (Roggio v. Hallmark Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roggio v. Hallmark Construction Corp., 64 A.D.2d 769, 407 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12615 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered August 8, 1977 in Albany County, which set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff rendered at a Trial Term and ordered a new trial unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of $50,000. Following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $155,000, the trial court granted defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict as excessive and ordered a new trial as to all issues unless the plaintiff, within 20 days following service of the order, stipulated to reduce the verdict to the sum of $50,000, in which event the motion was denied. Upon plaintiff’s failure to accept said sum of $50,000, the motion was granted. Our review of the record convinces us that the decision of the trial court should be affirmed. Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered August 8, 1977 in Albany County, which set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff rendered at a Trial Term and ordered a new trial unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of $50,000. Following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $155,000, the trial court granted defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict as excessive and ordered a new trial as to all issues unless the plaintiff, within 20 days following service of the order, stipulated to reduce the verdict to the sum of $50,000, in which event the motion was denied. Upon plaintiff’s failure to accept said sum of $50,000, the motion was granted. Our review of the record convinces us that the decision of the trial court should be affirmed. Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 769, 407 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roggio-v-hallmark-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1978.